Thursday, August 27, 2009

J-School summary

(1). The writer of the blog is Patrick Thornton.
(2). In his blog article titled “Let’s be honest about J-school”, Patrick Thornton opts to inform his readers of the pro’s and con’s of attending journalism school, and is true to his title by being honest about why it is not as glamorous a job as is often depicted. He plainly states that students who are not open to change, and will not work hard and get their hands dirty are not suitable to be journalists.
Thornton divides his article into sub headings that each have their own criticisms (whether constructive or not) and comments that support his claims, such as Columbia having been a ‘top-ranked’ Journalism school many years ago, but not being one anymore. He says that J-school is not enough to encourage students to start their own ventures and become entrepreneurs, and that the networking is not the only thing one would benefit from whilst attending Columbia.
His subsequent sub heading, called “Professors matter”, has Thornton personally naming and honouring professors at various institutions (Journalism schools), and he emphasizes the importance of a professor who wants to encourage positive change in the media sphere, and appreciates all web-related aspects of journalism. Thornton adds that a professor who can write valuable blogs is also an advantage.
Thornton then goes on to stress the importance of having an undergraduate degree, whether it is one in journalism or not. He states the benefits of attending J-school as either an undergraduate or graduate, and when one should consider attending either of the two.
Under his “Connections” sub heading, Thornton highlights the source of his connection and network-building as being his blogs, and other journalism websites, as opposed to J-school as one would assume. He also attributes his successful connections to journalism social events and parties. To some extent, he plainly disregards J-school as a site for connections to be made.
As alternative learning options such as gaining writing and research skills, Thornton suggests that students sign up for (sometimes free) journalism courses and sites that would cost a fraction of what obtaining a degree would. In effect they have similar benefits.
In his concluding section, “Writing skills are overrated”, Thornton emphasizes that a good journalist is not one who has excellent writing skills, but rather outstanding reporting skills and is thus an excellent reporter. He merely says that “No amount of great writing will cover up for shoddy reporting. Never.”


Semenya blog response:
"I think that there is some justification in the speculation of Semenya’s gender, as I was even taken aback when I saw her masculine image for the first time, running amidst fellow female women athletes. However, the way the IAAF has handled the situation has been morally demeaning and embarrassing, and could have been done discreetly at a later stage."

3 comments:

  1. Hi Prof. Anthonissen, please note that I have included my Semenya blog response in this blog, please let me know if it is appropriate and if it can be published on the actual site. Thanx!

    ReplyDelete
  2. RE your Semenya blog response - I think it is a topic that has now winded down a bit, so I would not post it now. I think your first sentence stating how you thought her to be too masculine to be among women athletes is a bit too persona. People do that on blogs, so its not disallowed - but considering that a person cannot choose what is genetically given to her, and that this woman is only 18 yrs old, I'd say all could have been more careful. The IAAF did nothing at the beginning of the games ... waited till she turned out to be a potential winner; then, rather than asking about performance enhancing drugs, they come with a public announcement of gender-checking ... very offensive! I think they have been shamed as there has been much criticism - even from other well-respected international athletes and commentators.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Re journalism training:
    For the other side of the story on journalism training - see: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/22/media-studies
    Also, go again to http://ow.ly/ky3A - and then you click on the image of King Kaufman to get his most recent post: The man in charge of online news, 1981. This article is important because it gives an overview of how circulation of news electronically has developed since the advent of internet, i.e. in the past 30 years. There is currently a debate on whether newspapers are losing readers because of the internet, and so should see electronic news circulation as competition, where the i-net gives an unfair advantage. The alternative view is that the big news companies have a monopoly, they control too much of what we see and what not ... and the i-net gives others a chance to get their views circulated as well. For this - see http://dominicself.co.uk/blog/?query=&amount=0&blogid=1

    ReplyDelete